Counting Sequences
Problem Overview
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Difficulty | Easy |
| Category | Combinatorics / Mathematics |
| Time Limit | 1 second |
| Key Technique | Modular Exponentiation |
| CSES Link | Exponentiation |
Learning Goals
After solving this problem, you will be able to:
- Apply the multiplication principle for counting sequences
- Implement binary exponentiation for efficient power computation
- Handle modular arithmetic to prevent integer overflow
- Recognize when a counting problem reduces to a simple formula
Problem Statement
Problem: Count the number of sequences of length k where each element can be any integer from 1 to n.
Input:
- Line 1: Two integers n and k (maximum element value and sequence length)
Output:
- The count of possible sequences, modulo 10^9 + 7
Constraints:
- 1 <= n, k <= 10^6
Example
Input:
3 2
Output:
9
Explanation: With n=3 elements {1, 2, 3} and sequence length k=2:
- Position 1 can be: 1, 2, or 3 (3 choices)
- Position 2 can be: 1, 2, or 3 (3 choices)
- Total sequences: 3 x 3 = 9
All sequences: [1,1], [1,2], [1,3], [2,1], [2,2], [2,3], [3,1], [3,2], [3,3]
Intuition: How to Think About This Problem
Pattern Recognition
Key Question: For each position in the sequence, how many choices do we have?
Each of the k positions can independently hold any of the n values. Since choices at one position do not affect choices at another, we use the multiplication principle: total = n x n x … x n (k times) = n^k.
Breaking Down the Problem
- What are we looking for? Total count of distinct sequences
- What information do we have? n possible values, k positions
- What’s the relationship between input and output? Each position multiplies our choices by n
Analogies
Think of this like a combination lock with k dials, where each dial can show any number from 1 to n. The total number of possible codes is n^k.
Solution 1: Brute Force (Recursive Enumeration)
Idea
Generate all possible sequences by trying every value at each position recursively.
Algorithm
- Start at position 0
- Try each value from 1 to n at the current position
- Recurse to the next position
- Count when we reach position k
Code
def count_sequences_brute(n, k, mod=10**9+7):
"""
Brute force: enumerate all sequences recursively.
Time: O(n^k) - generates all sequences
Space: O(k) - recursion depth
"""
def count(pos):
if pos == k:
return 1
total = 0
for _ in range(n):
total = (total + count(pos + 1)) % mod
return total
return count(0)
Complexity
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n^k) | Generates all n^k sequences |
| Space | O(k) | Recursion stack depth |
Why This Works (But Is Slow)
The brute force correctly counts every sequence but becomes impossibly slow for large inputs. With n=1000, k=1000, we would need 1000^1000 operations!
Solution 2: Optimal (Binary Exponentiation)
Key Insight
The Trick: The answer is simply n^k mod (10^9+7). Use binary exponentiation to compute this in O(log k) time.
Mathematical Formula
Total sequences = n^k (mod 10^9 + 7)
Why? By the multiplication principle:
- Position 1: n choices
- Position 2: n choices (independent)
- …
- Position k: n choices (independent)
- Total = n * n * … * n = n^k
Algorithm
- Handle base cases (k=0 returns 1, n=0 returns 0)
- Use binary exponentiation to compute n^k mod m
- Return the result
Dry Run Example
Let’s trace through with n = 3, k = 5:
Computing 3^5 mod (10^9 + 7) using binary exponentiation:
k = 5 in binary = 101
Initial: result = 1, base = 3
Step 1: k = 5 (odd, bit = 1)
result = 1 * 3 = 3
base = 3 * 3 = 9
k = 5 >> 1 = 2
Step 2: k = 2 (even, bit = 0)
result stays 3
base = 9 * 9 = 81
k = 2 >> 1 = 1
Step 3: k = 1 (odd, bit = 1)
result = 3 * 81 = 243
base = 81 * 81 = 6561
k = 1 >> 1 = 0
Done! Result = 243
Verify: 3^5 = 3*3*3*3*3 = 243 (correct!)
Visual Diagram
Binary Exponentiation for n^k:
k in binary: k = b_m b_{m-1} ... b_1 b_0
n^k = n^(2^0 * b_0) * n^(2^1 * b_1) * ... * n^(2^m * b_m)
Example: 3^5 = 3^(101 in binary)
= 3^(4+0+1)
= 3^4 * 3^1
= 81 * 3 = 243
We square the base repeatedly and multiply when bit is 1:
base: 3 -> 9 -> 81 -> ...
^ ^
| |
b_0=1 b_2=1 (include these in result)
Code
Python:
def count_sequences(n, k, mod=10**9+7):
"""
Count sequences using binary exponentiation.
Time: O(log k)
Space: O(1)
"""
# Edge cases
if k == 0:
return 1
if n == 0:
return 0
# Python's built-in pow handles modular exponentiation efficiently
return pow(n, k, mod)
def count_sequences_manual(n, k, mod=10**9+7):
"""
Manual implementation of binary exponentiation.
"""
if k == 0:
return 1
if n == 0:
return 0
result = 1
base = n % mod
while k > 0:
if k & 1: # If k is odd (last bit is 1)
result = (result * base) % mod
base = (base * base) % mod
k >>= 1 # Divide k by 2
return result
# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
n, k = map(int, input().split())
print(count_sequences(n, k))
Complexity
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(log k) | Binary exponentiation halves k each iteration |
| Space | O(1) | Only a few variables needed |
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Integer Overflow
Problem: Multiplying before taking mod causes overflow.
Fix: Take mod after each multiplication: result = (result * n) % mod;
Mistake 2: Slow Linear Exponentiation
# WRONG - too slow for k up to 10^6
def slow_pow(n, k, mod):
result = 1
for _ in range(k): # O(k) iterations!
result = (result * n) % mod
return result
Problem: O(k) is too slow when k can be 10^6. Fix: Use binary exponentiation for O(log k) time.
Mistake 3: Forgetting Edge Cases
# WRONG - crashes or gives wrong answer for edge cases
def count_sequences(n, k, mod):
return pow(n, k, mod) # What if n=0? k=0?
Problem: n=0 should return 0 (no elements to choose), k=0 should return 1 (empty sequence). Fix: Handle edge cases explicitly before the main computation.
Mistake 4: Incorrect Mod Value
# WRONG - using wrong modulo
MOD = 1e9 + 7 # This is a float!
# CORRECT
MOD = 10**9 + 7 # Integer
MOD = 1000000007 # Also integer
Edge Cases
| Case | Input | Expected Output | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empty sequence | k = 0 | 1 | One way to have empty sequence |
| No elements | n = 0, k > 0 | 0 | Cannot form non-empty sequence |
| Single element | n = 1 | 1 | All positions must be 1 |
| Single position | k = 1 | n | Just n choices |
| Large values | n = 10^6, k = 10^6 | (computed) | Must use modular exponentiation |
When to Use This Pattern
Use Binary Exponentiation When:
- Computing large powers (a^b where b is large)
- Working with modular arithmetic
- Matrix exponentiation for DP optimization
- Computing Fibonacci numbers in O(log n)
Recognize Counting with Multiplication Principle When:
- Choices at each step are independent
- No constraints between positions
- Answer is product of choices at each step
Pattern Recognition Checklist:
- Are positions independent? --> Multiplication principle
- Need a^b for large b? --> Binary exponentiation
- Working with mod? --> Take mod at each step
Related Problems
Easier (Do These First)
| Problem | Why It Helps |
|---|---|
| Exponentiation | Basic modular exponentiation |
| Exponentiation II | Fermat’s little theorem extension |
Similar Difficulty
| Problem | Key Difference |
|---|---|
| Counting Rooms | Flood fill counting |
| Dice Combinations | DP instead of direct formula |
Harder (Do These After)
| Problem | New Concept |
|---|---|
| Bracket Sequences I | Catalan numbers |
| Counting Necklaces | Burnside’s lemma |
| Graph Paths I | Matrix exponentiation |
Key Takeaways
- The Core Idea: Counting sequences with n choices and k positions = n^k
- Time Optimization: Binary exponentiation reduces O(k) to O(log k)
- Space Trade-off: O(1) space - no arrays needed
- Pattern: Multiplication principle + modular arithmetic
Practice Checklist
Before moving on, make sure you can:
- Explain why the answer is n^k using the multiplication principle
- Implement binary exponentiation from scratch
- Handle modular arithmetic correctly to avoid overflow
- Identify when a counting problem reduces to a power formula
Additional Resources
- CP-Algorithms: Binary Exponentiation
- CP-Algorithms: Modular Arithmetic
- CSES Distributing Apples - Stars and bars counting